All rights are really just saying what you can’t do

The freedom of speech isn’t about being able to say whatever you want. The freedom of speech is a protection against others that would harm you because of what you say.

All legal ‘rights’ are like this. They say either directly or indirectly what should not be done, not what should be done.

The right to life is not a natural right. You can do nothing but be alive. It is really a condemnation against murder.
The same with ‘natural’ right of liberty. It is actually more about those who take liberty rather than give it.

So what natural rights do we have?

• If you cannot chose any other option, it is not a right. Such as a ‘Right to be Human’ or a ‘Right to Exist’

• Rights should have the fewest negative consequences to yourself/others
• > Rights should not infringe upon the rights (natural or legal) of others.

So based on it being a choice that does not take away the ability to choose (possibly a right, but like how one isn’t prime)

• We have a Natural Right to an Opinion. We chose to agree/disagree with something, however, we don’t have to Right to act upon these opinions because they might harm others. We can dislike an artwork, but that doesn’t mean we can vandalize it. We can act on them, but we can be can face legal punishment for it.

For this natural right, we must face the consequences thgat apply to ourselvesof our own decisions, and seek to reduce negative consequences to others.

In the truest sense, this is the only Natural Right that we have. (Unless you guys can suggest others)

U.S. Officials: Russia Was Not Directly Involved in Shooting Down Plane


U.S. Officials: Russia Was Not Directly Involved in Shooting Down Plane

Senior U.S. intelligence officials said Russia is responsible for “creating the conditions” that led to the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, but there’s no evidence that the Russian government was directly involved in the shooting. The unnamed intelligence officials said Russian-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine likely shot down the plane with an SA-11 surface-to-air missile. While…

View On WordPress



so I had to make a lamp for pottery and sculpture II so I worked on my project all day today and every time people looked at me weird bc they were expecting like a bedazzled lampshades or some shit and I’m not about that so I got finished and went over to my teacher holding this huge motherfucker


and everyone was just staring at me like “what the fuck is this thing??? what???” and then I plugged it in


people fucking lost it


I want one

(via capitalism-godzilla)

Dutch forensics experts – accompanying the SMM – assessed the storage conditions for bodies on board the train at Torez railway station as good. At the main crash site, all bodies had been removed. The recovery process was assessed by the Dutch forensics experts as good.

-OSCE report 21 July

Hmm, but where is all the ‘they’re putting the bodies into trains!’ Or ‘thery’re leaving them to rot’
Seems like THOSE didn’t happen!

( the osce is better news than most media outlets, really the only ones that can honestly be trusted with reporting from the region IMO)



Video of Rebel Buk Launchers Headed Back to Russia? No – Images From Ukraine-Held Territory Since May
Key Piece of Video “Evidence” for Russian Responsibility for Malaysian Plane Shootdown Debunked

Mish is a highly-respected financial blogger. His Global Economic Analysis site routinely wins awards such as:


One of Mish’s trademarks is to speak with knowledgeable people in various subject areas, and report on what they said.

Today, Mish debunked one of the main pieces of video “evidence” claimed by the mainstream media to prove that Russia was behind the shootdown of the Malaysian plane over Ukraine:

Jacob Dreizin, a US citizen who speaks Russian and reads Ukrainian provided this update three hours ago.

Hello Mish,

On Friday, the Daily Mail, one of the major UK tabloids carried photos and video of what was alleged to be a rebel “Buk” launcher heading back to Russia. The article carried a claim from some Ukrainian source that the launcher was missing several missiles after having shot them at the Malaysian 777. The article was prominently linked to the Drudge Report, and so was probably viewed by several million people.

Today, this meme made it into Uncle Sam’s official narrative, as per the following New York Times excerpt:

On the CBS program “Face the Nation,” Mr. Kerry referred to a video that the Ukrainians have made public showing an SA-11 unit heading back to Russia after the downing of the plane with “a missing missile or so.”

The video referenced by the New York Times was, in fact, posted on the Facebook account of the Ukrainian Interior Minister. The allegation was that the launcher was crossing the border with Russia.

However, going by the billboard and other features of the scenery, Russian bloggers and news sources claim to have identified the road in the video as having been taken in or near the town of Krasnoarmeisk (“Krasnoarmiysk” in Ukrainian), which has been under Kiev’s control since May.

In fact, the billboard is supposedly advertising a Krasnoarmeisk car dealership. Also, one of the structures in the background is said to be a construction materials store on Gorkii Street, Krasnoarmeisk.

Please note that this town is (very roughly) 120 kilometers from the Russian border and 80 kilometers from where the Malaysian 777 went down. And again, it has been under Kiev’s control since May.

At least one other clip of the “Russian Buk” that has been made available also suggests that the Ukrainians are showing their own equipment. I’m still working on researching that one for you.


Video in Question

It is beyond incredibly sloppy for Ukraine to release such a video with a clear billboard of something in Ukraine-held territory, purportedly showing a Buk missile launcher headed back to Russia.

And we are supposed to believe Kiev? Kerry?

Please be serious. If you are really interested in the truth, you do not resort to such easily disproved and sloppy bullsheet.

This is – of course – not the first piece of video “evidence” trumpeted by the MSM which has been debunked.


Here is the scenario: A major power interferes in another countries independence struggle, sending money and weapons into a complicated political situation due to a feeling of past kinship or shared heritage.

I bet you think I am talking about the current tragedy in Ukraine.

Actually I am talking about America.

Americans funded various paramilitary groups during the ‘Troubles’ in Northern Ireland which left an estimated 3,600 people dead. The majority of these were civilians.

The events in Ukraine are awful but not unique in a society where forgotten ethnic identities and old colonial claims still hold sway

Links: troubles_violence